?

Log in

No account? Create an account
entries friends calendar profile Elf Sternberg's Pendorwright Projects Previous Previous Next Next
Paying my dues, Studying the masters... - Elf M. Sternberg
elfs
elfs
Paying my dues, Studying the masters...

I sometimes give the impression that I’m an excellent programmer, and to the extent that I’m empowered to code within my narrow little specialty, web-based interfaces for industrial and enterprise users, I’m comfortable saying I’m one of the best.  It’s pretty much all I’ve done for the past 15 years: Isilon, Spiral Genetics, and now Splunk all used my jQuery/Backbone/Python/NodeJS/HTML5 expertise to create and maintain lively and vibrant cybernetic applications (in the classic sense of “cybernetic,” i.e. control systems) for their specific deployments: A cloud-based storage solution, a cloud-based gene sequencing engine, a database and query engine for semi-structured information.


But outside of that specialty, I’m somewhat lost.  I know a lot of things, like SQL, video processing, natural language processing, and so on, that I’ve only ever played with or that I’ve only ever had to use once, professionally; these things live in the back of my brain and just kinda lie there, useless.


In the Serendipity stories I told earlier this year, I highlighted specific hiring instances where skills I had acquired for unprofessional reasons (and let’s face it, “I watch a lot of anime” is pretty unprofessional) had serious professional uses.


Today, I posted to my github a Language In 20, a quick programming language based on James Coglan’s lecture “A Language in 20 Minutes“, in which he snowflakes a programming language from nothing to a Turing-complete integer calculator capable of recursion.  I still haven’t had the necessary insight to understand the scoping issue, despite getting it right… but then I was just following Coglan’s lead.  My implementation is different; since PegJS doesn’t auto-create interfaces to parser classes, I had to write my own switch statement about types, and I tried to avoid using classes as much as possible.  I didn’t succeed; I may go back and revise it to be more “functional,” using closures rather than classes.


It’s frustrating seeing how far away I am from what I really want to know and do; it’s equally frustrating knowing that precisely zero of my corporate masters have ever had any interest in my learning this stuff.  It doesn’t make me a better programmer; in fact, it makes me aware of just how bad most programming, mine and others, really is.

1 comment or Leave a comment
Comments
ungulata From: ungulata Date: March 16th, 2015 12:55 pm (UTC) (Link)
You have to pretty good to see just how bad you are at something. ^_^

I take adequate pictures. I know what good pictures look like so I know that mine are just adequate. I also annoy people when I tell them that photography is easy, there's hardly any skill required to take a nice picture. Just hold the camera steady, mind the thirds and take a lot of pictures. No-brainer, right? I guess not.

I've noticed for a long time just how bloated software is. For instance, wordprocessing software. I started with WordStar. There was room for both the WordStar and several output files (stuff I'd typed) on one 5¼ floppy. I ran that on an 8088 along with a few keyboard-mashing games. Each increase in magnitude of processing power seems to have been accompanied by an increase in magnitude in code without a proportional increase in versatility. At this point I'd expect art applications that practically paint themselves under the guide of a Theremin-esque control interface.
1 comment or Leave a comment