Log in

No account? Create an account
entries friends calendar profile Elf Sternberg's Pendorwright Projects Previous Previous Next Next
Mormon Fundamentalists vs. Connubial Queers! - Elf M. Sternberg
Mormon Fundamentalists vs. Connubial Queers!
I cannot help but wonder if it's frakking hilarious or deeply sad to read a group called "pro-polygamy.com" editorialize that "gay marriage cannot exist because marriage is defined as a union where the meeting of male and female genitalia is possible." But they do exist.

How strange!

Current Mood: amused amused
Current Music: SSX Tricky, It's Tricky!

3 comments or Leave a comment
solarbird From: solarbird Date: June 5th, 2006 03:53 am (UTC) (Link)
I am so gakking this for the next CWU.
memegarden From: memegarden Date: June 5th, 2006 04:15 am (UTC) (Link)
Hmm...by their definition of adultery, couldn't a bonded pair of men commit adultery with women, and vice versa? And I presume that they consider any marriage that does not involve coitus to be invalid, including heterosexual couples that can't have coitus for medical reasons. I am curious about the case they describe, and expect that "adultery" was defined rather narrowly in the state law in question for such a decision to have been made. To me, this shows that the law is silly, not that there was no adultery. What a nutty lot.
gromm From: gromm Date: June 5th, 2006 06:23 am (UTC) (Link)
I especially enjoyed the google ad that (for me) came up with

"Marry legally in Canada
Same sex marriage made easy low cost, no contract, no hidden extras

I have to wonder if maybe they also reject heterosexual groupings with more than one male partnre, on the premise that "it just ain't the way it's done" or some other such nonsense.
3 comments or Leave a comment